Packaging Efficiency & Logistics Cost Optimization

15/01/2026

1 Standard

Procurement Evaluation Criteria

In 2026 cost-reduction programs, leading importers no longer evaluate packaging solely based on material cost or damage prevention. Instead, packaging is assessed as a core determinant of Total Landed Cost (TLC) and supply chain efficiency.

The standard evaluation criteria include:

  • Verified container loading capacity (pcs per 40HQ)
  • Unit freight cost per product (freight per piece)
  • Impact on loading, unloading, and warehouse handling efficiency
  • Packaging-related risk exposure, including damage rate and operational complexity

Disqualifying practices include:

  • Cost-down claims based only on carton material savings
  • Container optimization that compromises transport safety
  • One-off packaging solutions that cannot be replicated at scale

Procurement Objective:

To determine whether packaging is engineered as a repeatable, structural cost-reduction tool, rather than a short-term tactical adjustment.

2 Methodology

Packaging System Comparison Under a Unified Cost Framework

To ensure objective comparison, packaging solutions are evaluated using the same performance indicators and cost assumptions.

Two parallel packaging systems are assessed:

A. Carton Packaging System

  • Standard individual carton packaging
  • Widely compatible with global logistics networks
  • Limited by carton void space and stacking constraints

B. Trolley-Based Loading System

  • Chairs loaded and secured on reusable transport trolleys
  • Reduced void space and improved container density
  • Potential benefits in loading speed and warehouse handling

Core Methodological Principle:

Packaging decisions are made based on unit volume efficiency and freight allocation, not on packaging material cost alone.

Key metrics applied:

  • Pieces per 40HQ container
  • Freight cost per piece
  • Incremental handling or operational impact
  • Transportation damage rate

3 Case Study

Same Product, Two Packaging Systems

Product: Commercial plastic chair (same structure, dimensions, and material)

Container Type: 40HQ

Shipping Conditions: Identical freight rate per container

Packaging Performance Comparison

  • Carton Packaging: 1,120 pcs / 40HQ
  • Trolley-Based Loading: 1,440 pcs / 40HQ

The trolley system increases container utilization by reducing carton voids and stacking limitations while maintaining product stability during transport.

4 Data

Quantified Cost and Efficiency Impact

4.1 Container Utilization Improvement

Result:

Trolley-based loading improves container utilization by 28.6%, equivalent to 320 additional chairs per 40HQ container.

4.2 Unit Freight Cost Reduction

(Assuming constant freight cost per container)

Result:

The unit freight cost per chair is reduced by approximately 22.2%, without any reduction in product specifications or factory pricing.


4.3 Summary Table

Metric Carton Packaging Trolley Loading Change
Pieces per 40HQ 1,120 1,440 +28.6%
Unit Freight Cost (Index) 1.00 0.78 −22.2%
Additional Units per Container +320 pcs

5 Risk and Operational Considerations

Transport Safety

All trolley-based shipments are secured using defined fixing points and protective buffers at critical stress areas (seat edges, backrest, leg contact zones). Damage rate monitoring is conducted on consecutive shipments.

Warehouse Compatibility

Trolley systems are evaluated for compatibility with destination warehouse workflows, including unloading, temporary storage, and internal movement. Where required, hybrid models (trolley unloading + palletization) are applied.

Cost Allocation of Trolleys

Trolley cost is evaluated separately using a depreciation or reuse model. Procurement acceptance requires that:

The per-shipment amortized trolley cost remains significantly lower than the freight cost savings generated.


6.Packaging as a Structural Cost-Reduction Lever

This case demonstrates that packaging optimization can deliver double-digit cost savings at the logistics level without altering product design, materials, or factory pricing.

For the evaluated chair model:

  • Container efficiency increased by 28.6%
  • Unit freight cost reduced by approximately 22.2%

Such improvements represent structural, repeatable cost reductions, aligning with 2026 procurement priorities focused on cost control, risk mitigation, and long-term supply chain stability.

Wonderful! Share this Case:

Custom Versatile Furniture For Any Room

Fill out the contact form with your ideas today and find the right furniture sets for your room applications.

Inquiry

    Download Catalog

      Inquiry